Blog Tour: THE YEAR OF SHADOWS by Claire Legrand (Guest Post & Giveaway)

I was so excited when Claire contacted me about hosting a stop on her blog tour. I played cello when I was younger, so something set in a concert hall and with an orchestra? Sign me up! 
I asked Claire if she would talk about her revision process for her guest post, and she graciously agreed. I have to say, I was fascinated reading her guest post and am so glad she is sharing it here. Read what she has to stay, and stick around for the giveaway at the end of this post!

Title: THE YEAR OF SHADOWS

Author: Claire Legrand
Publisher: Simon & Schuster Books for Young Readers
Release Date: August 27, 2013
Number of Pages: 416
Source of Book: ARC from publisher

Olivia Stellatella is having a rough year.
      Her mother left, her neglectful father — the maestro of a failing orchestra — has moved her and her grandmother into his dark, broken-down concert hall to save money, and her only friend is Igor, an ornery stray cat.
      Just when she thinks life couldnโ€™t get any weirder, she meets four ghosts who haunt the hall. They need Oliviaโ€™s help — if the hall is torn down, theyโ€™ll be stuck as ghosts forever, never able to move on.
Olivia has to do the impossible for her shadowy new friends: Save the concert hall. But helping the dead has powerful consequences for the living . . . and soon itโ€™s not just the concert hall that needs saving.

Claire Legrand used to be a musician until she realized she couldn’t stop thinking about the stories in her head. Now a writer, Ms. Legrand can often be found typing with purpose at her keyboard, losing herself in the stacks at her local library, or embarking upon spontaneous adventures to lands unknown. Her first novel is THE CAVENDISH HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS, a New York Public Library Best Book for Children in 2012. Her second novel, THE YEAR OF SHADOWS, releases August 27, 2013, with her third novel, WINTERSPELL, to follow in fall 2014. She is one of the four authors behind THE CABINET OF CURIOSITIES, an anthology of dark middle grade fiction due out in July 2014 from Greenwillow Books/HarperCollins. Claire lives in New Jersey with a dragon and two cats. Visit her at claire-legrand.com and at enterthecabinet.com.

Iโ€™m so
excited to be here at Heise Reads & Recommends for day 14 (yowza!) of The Year of Shadows blog tour!
Today
Iโ€™ll be giving you a sneak peek into the revision process for The Year of Shadowsโ€”and Iโ€™ll admit, Iโ€™m
a little nervous! Although revising is a normal, necessary part of the writing
process (and my favorite part of the
process, in fact), Iโ€™m always irrationally frustrated that I canโ€™t just, you
know, write the book the way it needs to be written the first time around. Admitting that Iโ€™m unable to do that, and
sharing what Iโ€™ve put my book through to make it shine, wounds my pride.
But my
pride is silly; no one can write a good book without also putting that book
through revisionsโ€”and maybe even rewrites! So, with that in mind, letโ€™s take a
look at how The Year of Shadows evolved
from wee baby manuscript to shiny final book.
My
inimitable editor, Zareen Jaffery, and I have worked together on three books
now, and the revision process for each started the same way: Zareen sent me a
thorough, thoughtful editorial letter. Each letter began with her overall
thoughts about the book in question, and then continued with sub-sections of
comments focused on major characters, world building elements, and themes.
Zareen
asks a lot of questions in her editorial letters, which I love. Instead of
telling me, โ€œThis needs to be this way instead of that wayโ€ or โ€œDo this here
instead of that,โ€ she asks me questions that prompt me to think more critically
about what Iโ€™ve written. With The Year of
Shadows
, our main focuses during revisions were 1) world building (the hows
and whys of the ghosts and their anchors), 2) pacing (thereโ€™s a lot going on in
this book!), and 3) Olivia herself. Olivia is a complex heroine, and it was
important to me that readers fully understood the motivations behind her anger,
bitterness, and loneliness.
One of
the most important relationships in the book is between Olivia and her father,
the Maestro. The nuances of this complicated relationship took a while for me
to get just right. In that first editorial letter, Zareen asked some great
questions about their relationship:
            The Maestro is easily hate-able when we see him through
Oliviaโ€™s eyes. But, just 
            as her opinion
of him softens, Iโ€™d like to introduce a more complicated reasoning 
            behind his neglect, and soften some of the passages
where he is verbally abusive 
            towards her.
Pg 70, 165. Itโ€™s hard to
understand why the Maestro is so mean to Olivia. Neglectful I can justify. But
to lash out at her and accuse her of wanting him to be ruined? That seems so
unnecessary. Why does he do this?
Zareen brings
up excellent points here. I could have easily made the Maestro a
one-dimensional villain, and in fact, he was much less complex and sympathetic
in this early draft. But the world isnโ€™t black and white, as much as angry
Olivia might at first see it that way, and the Maestro is no exception. By doing
just as Zareen suggestedโ€”softening some of the passages where he is more
temperamental, and giving the reader (and Olivia) more of an insight into why he acts the way he doesโ€”I was able
to create a much more well-rounded character in the Maestro.
Below is an
excerpt from the first draft of the manuscript. Olivia snuck into her fatherโ€™s
room during a concert, searching for a ghostโ€™s anchor. When the Maestro finds
her there, he gets angry:
            โ€œWhat were you doing in my room?โ€ the
Maestro whispered. His eyes were wild, but I wasnโ€™t afraid. I could think only
about those unopened letters, one after another after another.
            โ€œI was . . . cleaning,โ€ I said.
            The Maestro looked past me at his
bedroom, just as dirty as it had been before. โ€œAnd what a cleaning job. Perhaps
you will tell me the truth now?โ€
            โ€œI told you: cleaning.โ€
            โ€œYou awful child. You plot with
Walter to ruin me!โ€
            โ€œWhoโ€™s Walter?โ€
            โ€œRue. Walter Rue. Donโ€™t play stupid,
Olivia.โ€
            I wiped the Maestroโ€™s angry spit
from my cheek. โ€œI didnโ€™t know Mr. Rueโ€™s first name, so sue me!โ€
            โ€œYou search my room, looking for my
secrets,โ€ he said, pointing a shaking finger at me. โ€œSecrets to share with him,
to speed up the process. You want me to fail just as he does, donโ€™t you? You
would love to see this Hall crumble to dust, see me turn to dust!โ€
            He stepped closer to me, his eyes
wild. I had never seen the Maestro this angry, all crazy-eyed and deathly
quiet.
                        โ€œYouโ€™re
crazy,โ€ I said, backing away. โ€œJust look at you. No wonder Mom left.โ€
See how
unstable the Maestro seems? How his words and attitude border on violent?
Olivia even seems afraid of him. He calls her an โ€œawful childโ€! Itโ€™s all a bit
cartoonish and over-the-top. Compare that with the same passage from the final
book:
            โ€œWhat were you doing in my room?โ€ The Maestro
was in his full-blown post-concert stateโ€”skin flushed and sweating, hair wild,
the permanent bags under his eyes even darker than normal. People didnโ€™t like
to mess with the Maestro after concerts, especially not these days. But I could
think only about those unopened letters, one after another after another.
            โ€œCleaning,โ€ I said, glaring at him.
            The Maestro looked past me at his
bedroom. โ€œAnd what a cleaning job. Perhaps you will tell me the truth now?โ€
            โ€œI told you. Cleaning.โ€
            โ€œYou shouldnโ€™t go in peopleโ€™s rooms
without their permission, Olivia.โ€ The Maestro wiped his face with a stained
handerchief. โ€œI give you your privacy. You should give me mine.โ€
            . . .
            โ€œI donโ€™t know what [Mom] ever saw in
you.โ€ The sight of him repulsed me. He was too sweaty and too skinny and too
tired. โ€œNo wonder she left.โ€
Everything
is more subtle in the final version of the scene. We see signs of the Maestroโ€™s
exhaustionโ€”the bags under his eyes, the stained handkerchief. We even see that
Olivia knows how tired she isโ€”and maybe, underneath her anger, feels sorry for
him. Instead of raging at Olivia, the Maestro calmly admonishes her for going
through his belongings. This allows both Oliviaโ€”and the readerโ€”to feel more
sympathy for him. We see a man overwhelmed by terrible circumstances, rather
than a man bordering on abusiveโ€”but we still understand Oliviaโ€™s anger toward
him.
Hereโ€™s
another great point made by Zareen in her editorial letter:
Olivia seemingly idolizes her
motherโ€ฆ except for the little detail that Cara left her, which Olivia seems to
blame solely on her father. Why doesnโ€™t Olivia blame her mother more?
When I
read this, I felt, I confess, a bit flabbergasted. Of course Olivia would blame
her mother! Why didnโ€™t I think about this before? (This is a common refrain
during the revisions process, by the way, and why editors are so invaluable. By
asking all the right questions, they help you discover nuances of the story
that you missed the first time around, and help clarify sentiments you thought you had expressed clearly but ended
up getting lost on the page.) I realized that Olivia should want her mother
back, yes, and miss her, and most of her anger should be focused at the parent
who is actually present, the parent easy to blameโ€”the Maestroโ€”but she should
also be angry at her mother, and then feel guilty for that anger. Because of
this great question from Zareen, I was able to tease out a whole new level of
emotion from Olivia, and add another layer of emotional conflict to the story.
Notice
that Zareen didnโ€™t say, โ€œOlivia should blame her mother more.โ€ She asked, โ€œWhy
doesnโ€™t Olivia blame her mother more?โ€ Good editors donโ€™t direct; they guide,
nudge, inspire. If I had a solid reason for Olivia not blaming her mother, I
could have explained it to Zareen, and she would have accepted that. But even
in that case, her question would have made me re-examine my thought process.
Sometimes
entire passages didnโ€™t make it into the book, passages that were fun for me to
write but derailed the storyโ€™s focus. In an early draft of the book, I added a
Greek chorus of three elderly men who liked to sit on the bench outside Emerson
Hall. Olivia talked to them occasionally, and they offered advice or just
uttered entertaining non-sequiturs. But their addition slowed the overall
pacing, so I ended up deleting them entirely. For fun, here is their first
appearance from an early draft:
            There was this bench on the sidewalk there,
up against the wall of the Hall. It was green and its paint was peeling, and
there were these three guys that sat there most mornings, watching the traffic
and reading the paper. One was Hat Guy (he wore a hat). One was Cigar Guy (he
liked cigars). The third was Cool Guy (he wore sunglasses, even if it was
raining).
            I never asked them their real names,
and they never asked me mine. It was this unspoken thing of ours. Used to, they
called me Music Girl. You know, being the daughter of an orchestra conductor
and all.
            But ever since Mom disappeared nine
months ago, they started calling me Shadow Girl. I wore black a lot now. My
hair was long and black, too, and shiny, and I wore it down most of the time. I
liked to hide behind it and pretend I wasnโ€™t even there.
            โ€œYou all right, Shadow Girl?โ€ Hat
Guy said.
            Cigar Guy peeked out over the top of
his paper. Cool Guy chewed his gum.
            โ€œNot really,โ€ I said. โ€œEverythingโ€™s
wrong.โ€
            Cool Guy said, โ€œMaybe you should go
on back inside.โ€
            I nodded and picked up my suitcase,
hiding my face., I didnโ€™t want the Bench Guys to see me cry.
See? Fun! But not entirely relevant to the
proceedings. I transferred any useful exposition from their deleted scenes into
scenes that already existed, thereby streamlining the storyโ€™s pacing. I am,
however, still quite fond of Bench Guys. Maybe they need their own story
someday! And thatโ€™s something important to remember about revisions: Sometimes
the nature of the book requires you to delete favorite passages, characters,
even entire storylines! This can be painful. But just because this material
doesnโ€™t fit into this book doesnโ€™t mean
you canโ€™t re-work it for use in another book.
After I integrate comments from that first editorial
letter into the manuscript, I send the updated version to Zareen. Sometimes we
talk over the phone about the changes Iโ€™ve made before she reads the newest
draft. Zareen then begins line edits, leaving comments throughout the
manuscript. Sometimes she will also send another, much more brief editorial
letter addressing any remaining, overarching issues, but the bulk of edits this
time around are on the micro level rather than the macro level.
Zareenโ€™s line edits include everything from word
repetition, to world building clarification and consistency, to making sure
thereโ€™s enough Igor. (Igor is Oliviaโ€™s cat, and he seems to be a huge fan
favorite.) Zareen also, blessedly, includes a lot of positive comments in her
line edits: โ€œI love this!โ€ or โ€œSuch a great moment!โ€ or โ€œAWESOME visual.โ€
Revisions can be both exhilarating and excruciating. Those tiny, happy comments
are welcome boosts to my morale!
Below are some of Zareenโ€™s line edits:
Above, Olivia says Frederick canโ€™t touch things, but
right now heโ€™s touching her cheek. Rephrase?
(Ah! Such a tiny but important inconsistency. Good catch, Zareen!)
They have to relive the deaths of 51 ghosts? That sounds
traumatic! Would they so easily agree?
(No,
they wouldnโ€™t agree so easily! Hence why, in the final book, Olivia and Henry
are much more reluctant to help the rest of the ghosts, and end up having to
find help because they simply canโ€™t handle the stress.)
Should there be a little more fanfare to the audience
growing?
(Yes! In the final book, I
emphasize everyoneโ€™s excitement about the growing audience, and even brought
the press into the mix.)
Any way to insert Igor in this scene? Is he trying to
comfort her?
(Answer: ALWAYS MORE
IGOR.)
I hope you enjoyed this behind-the-scenes look at the
revision process for The Year of Shadows!
Revisions can be toughโ€”but they can also be the most rewarding part of bringing
a book to life. I know they are for me! As they say, revisions are where the
real writing begins, when you take the huge hunk of marble that is drafting and
start chipping away at it to turn it into something truly beautiful. (For a
more humorous take on the editorial process, check out
this post on
my blog, illustrated by yours truly.)

Be sure to enter the Rafflecopter giveaway below for a
chance to win a beautiful hardcover copy of The
Year of Shadows
! And you can check out the other blog tour stops here for
multiple chances to win!



PURCHASE LINKS:
amazon | barnes & noble | the book depository | indiebound | books-a-million | itunes

a Rafflecopter giveaway

13 Comments

  1. I think that if I were a writer revisions would be the hardest because I have heard of writers having to cut out thousands or even TENS of thousands, words and that would kill me to do that.

  2. Ooo… can I say I just don't have the discipline to be a writer? The times I've tried, my brain tries to the the drafting and revising all at once, and I give up in frustration.

  3. I'm not a writer but revising would be the hardest for me. I would constantly keep re-writing everything lol

  4. I love the revision process. Seeing the story go from "eh- it tells a story and it sorta makes sense" to wow! this book is so much better than I thought! is always a good experience, even if it's painful. I love editors!!

  5. I've never actually gotten past the drafting stage when writing a book, but whenever I have to revise something for like, school or something I just HATE it so I think they're both equally hard, but for different reasons, if that makes sense.

  6. I would think that getting everything out in a manner that pleased me would be the hardest part. It was always the hardest for me in school. Revising was always much easier, because I was just polishing rather than creating from scratch.

  7. Hmm, I think I enjoy drafting more, but I get more satisfaction from revision. This was a really interesting post! Thanks for the backstage look at your revision process ๐Ÿ™‚

  8. I think drafting would be harder because it is, to my estimation, harder to create than to manipulate.

  9. Revising!! Because there are all these different components which you have to look at critically and make sure they all work together perfectly:)

    Thank you! LOVE this post:) Thank you for sharing Claire! ๐Ÿ™‚

Comments are closed.